tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post9076192997759821873..comments2023-09-15T04:27:57.129-04:00Comments on Commentarama: 60 Minutes Outs PelosiAndrewPricehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comBlogger48125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-65552118073217736882011-11-16T17:26:18.227-05:002011-11-16T17:26:18.227-05:00Eric, That's the problem with the MSM being in...Eric, That's the problem with the MSM being in the tank for leftists -- even making the allegations is often attacked as somehow being racist or sexist or whatever.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-41734009324839443012011-11-16T16:56:48.476-05:002011-11-16T16:56:48.476-05:00Excellent summary and point about the timing. Sadl...Excellent summary and point about the timing. Sadly, doesn't matter when they cover it, as any support for exposing the truth will ultimately get spun into charges of racism.<br /><br />Middle-age cynicism. I love getting older ...EricPhttp://www.threedonia.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-60216843939880979352011-11-15T20:06:59.698-05:002011-11-15T20:06:59.698-05:00Indi, I missed that, but it wouldn't surprise ...Indi, I missed that, but it wouldn't surprise me... not one bit.<br /><br />Keeping it gr$$n indeed!AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-65014317123572064342011-11-15T20:04:38.747-05:002011-11-15T20:04:38.747-05:00Andrew
If I am not mistaken isn't Pelosi'...Andrew<br /><br />If I am not mistaken isn't Pelosi's husband an investor in Solyndra.<br /><br />I guess she is just keeping it $$Green$$. Huh!Individualisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11005025873042230314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-51190457387716658002011-11-15T17:54:13.398-05:002011-11-15T17:54:13.398-05:00T-Rav, It's not just Pelosi. It starts around...T-Rav, It's not just Pelosi. It starts around Clinton and has continued unabated -- all of them (left and right) are re-enacting the entire Gilded Age right down to the stock market manipulation and the (re)birth of a socialist movement. Heck, there's even a second railroad boom!<br /><br />It would make for a fascinating article except it would probably take weeks to really research it.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-17902981539156180812011-11-15T17:50:46.722-05:002011-11-15T17:50:46.722-05:00Crispy, Kagan of course will not recuse herself, b...Crispy, Kagan of course will not recuse herself, but I have a feeling Thomas won't either. He knows full well what's at stake here. <br /><br />Andrew, good point about Pelosi being the Gilded Age redux. Too bad it'll remain buried.T-Ravhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10861218035729479354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-65024823905488923832011-11-15T15:34:46.513-05:002011-11-15T15:34:46.513-05:00Ed, I agree. I love having them as an example of ...Ed, I agree. I love having them as an example of how disastrous the left really is, but it was rather nasty to let them abuse the locals.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-37957309977642202242011-11-15T15:28:58.655-05:002011-11-15T15:28:58.655-05:00It's about time they drove of the OWS Animal F...It's about time they drove of the OWS Animal Farmers. While I enjoyed the show, you really had to feel bad for people who lived and worked in that area.Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18122308626703654554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-70619181056837599932011-11-15T14:58:16.520-05:002011-11-15T14:58:16.520-05:00Thanks Crispy! I think that's true. When he&...Thanks Crispy! I think that's true. When he's on message he's doing fine. But he keeps getting tangled up in his own verbal gaffes and that's feeding his opponents.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-50846224810744142792011-11-15T14:51:43.473-05:002011-11-15T14:51:43.473-05:00This just in....
NYPD has cleared out Zuccotti P...<b>This just in....</b><br /><br /><br />NYPD has cleared out Zuccotti Park of the OWS clowns.<br /><br />Bloomberg is taking credit, saying the OWS camp had become a criminal camp and a health concern.<br /><br />Here's a link: <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/nypd_raiders_roust_rabble_Dp5jSkaFLwGXYElqsxsWjO" rel="nofollow">LINK</a>AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-8591071387001387422011-11-15T14:50:24.871-05:002011-11-15T14:50:24.871-05:00"He just needs to stop giving the neocons amm..."He just needs to stop giving the neocons ammunition to use against him in the foreign policy area. Now would be a good time for him to release more reform plans in areas like education and repeal of regulations."<br /><br />Also well said, Andrew!CrispyRicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07302075204880024936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-20163667235540855112011-11-15T13:59:11.631-05:002011-11-15T13:59:11.631-05:00Short and to the point. I like that Doc!Short and to the point. I like that Doc!AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-82408550687477977402011-11-15T13:53:44.280-05:002011-11-15T13:53:44.280-05:00Pelosi deserves jail time.Pelosi deserves jail time.Doc Whoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16283308866886912377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-24932664681314982992011-11-15T12:49:09.016-05:002011-11-15T12:49:09.016-05:00Crispy, That's the only way to get rid of a Su...Crispy, That's the only way to get rid of a Supreme unless they step down themselves (or die). And when it comes to that, it's the same rules as with Presidents -- they can be impeached for high crimes.... there are no real guidelines.<br /><br />I personally doubt the Republicans would do it, and I'm not even sure it would make sense, unless the public really rose up in a backlash and something truly damning came out about her role -- like she wrote a memo saying "this isn't legal, but once it's in place it will be too hard to undo." But barring that, I doubt anyone would (or should) try it.<br /><br />On Cain, I think they've stopped his momentum and cost him a couple percentage points, but the scandal appears entirely dead. With no actual substantive allegations ever being made, nothing new coming out, and even the accusers afraid to do their joint press conference, I think it's finished. If that's the case, then Cain has plenty of time to recover. He just needs to stop giving the neocons ammunition to use against him in the foreign policy area.<br /><br />Now would be a good time for him to release more reform plans in areas like education and repeal of regulations.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-12583266107385308012011-11-15T12:42:13.128-05:002011-11-15T12:42:13.128-05:00I didn't realize that Sup Ct justices could ev...I didn't realize that Sup Ct justices could even be impeached. Interesting. I do, however, have doubts that anyone would actually do it. *sigh*<br /><br />And PS - I'm still firmly in the GO CAIN GO!! camp! :) He's my man and I'm hanging in there for him.CrispyRicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07302075204880024936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-84961648819894409962011-11-15T12:35:54.451-05:002011-11-15T12:35:54.451-05:00Good question Ed. Truthfully, I'd say they ar...Good question Ed. Truthfully, I'd say they are low unless she is the deciding vote and there's clear evidence which even the public will see of her wanting to push this law whether or not it will stand up to legal scrutiny, and the public then delivers a body blow to the Democrats in November. I would say if any of those parts is missing, then it won't happen.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-65949122663729096652011-11-15T12:33:03.453-05:002011-11-15T12:33:03.453-05:00What are the chances she could be impeached if she...What are the chances she could be impeached if she didn't recuse herself?Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18122308626703654554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-30152751799541040382011-11-15T12:30:01.207-05:002011-11-15T12:30:01.207-05:00DUQ, The new meme all over the place today is &quo...DUQ, The new meme all over the place today is "it's time for conservatives to give up and fall in line with Romney because all the other alternatives have burned out"....<br /><br />... despite the fact Cain's "collapse" has him equal with Romney.<br /><br />... despite the fact we don't know how far Gingrich's rise will take him and it's already brought him equal to Romney.<br /><br />Does something strike you wrong about that?AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-10945332797582174982011-11-15T12:20:02.414-05:002011-11-15T12:20:02.414-05:00Andrew, After hearing all week how Herman Cain was...Andrew, After hearing all week how Herman Cain was finished, Bloomberg has an Iowa poll showing a four-way tie (Romney, Paul, Cain and Gingrich), with Cain in the lead!DUQnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-43172725682907427662011-11-15T12:16:47.702-05:002011-11-15T12:16:47.702-05:00Crispy, See my answer above. :)
On you and Stan h...Crispy, See my answer above. :)<br /><br />On you and Stan having the same question, obviously this is an interesting issue at the moment -- especially with ObamaCare to be decided right before the election (decision likely in July).<br /><br />Talk about a critical turning point moment for our country!AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-69892413853821702142011-11-15T12:15:35.722-05:002011-11-15T12:15:35.722-05:00Stan, Your colloquialism made me laugh! Bravo!
I ...Stan, Your colloquialism made me laugh! Bravo!<br /><br />I concur. If this was anyone except an important democratic politician, this person would have been arrested for bribery or graft. But since it's Princess Nancy, it's been ignored until now. Hopefully, that's about to change. Hopefully, the Congress will take this up and toss her out and hopefully some prosecutor somewhere outside her district will take a look at this being graft.<br /><br />On Kagan, you're 100% right -- she needs to recuse herself or she should be investigated and possibly impeached. (See my answer to Crispy above).AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-35836374009019680622011-11-15T12:12:28.799-05:002011-11-15T12:12:28.799-05:00Crispy, I know the fear of which you speak, but I ...Crispy, I know the fear of which you speak, but I doubt Thomas will recuse himself. The rules of judicial ethics simply don't require you to recuse yourself if a family member works for an industry that will be affected.<br /><br />But Kagan should.<br /><br />She was involved in this decision at the White House and that is the CLASSIC reason to recuse herself. If she doesn't, then she is deserves no respect as a jurist. In fact, Congress should vote to impeach or censure her at that point.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-14658139966633264422011-11-15T12:09:25.984-05:002011-11-15T12:09:25.984-05:00By the way, Pelosi is now calling this story "...By the way, Pelosi is now calling this story "right-wing propaganda" even though <i>60 Minutes</i> claims they independently verified the whole thing.<br /><br />Also, Newsweek now has an article on this in which they are describing how Visa "courted" Pelosi. They used 14 lobbying firms, they hired some of her people away, the "just happened to bump into her on the street," they hired her bank to do the sale, and they called her husband with the offer. This is the classic picture of a bribe! I recommend reading this: here's a yahoo link to the story: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/visas-courtship-nancy-pelosi-032100907.html" rel="nofollow">LINK</a>.<br /><br />If the MSM is turning on her with full throat, she may be finished. Interesting times!AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-88175446890219532862011-11-15T12:09:22.965-05:002011-11-15T12:09:22.965-05:00Great minds, Stan! LOL!
Well Andrew??Great minds, Stan! LOL!<br /><br />Well Andrew??CrispyRicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07302075204880024936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-49518511682782791022011-11-15T12:05:07.795-05:002011-11-15T12:05:07.795-05:00Princess Nancy is indeed a corrupt, evil, manipula...Princess Nancy is indeed a corrupt, evil, manipulating witch, whose only concern is, what’s in it for me? I know it’s redundant, but if this were in the private sector, you’d have the SEC so far up your rump, you wouldn’t know if you were spitting, or whistling Dixie (I used a Southern colloquialism as not to become profane). I firmly believe along with firing as many of these corrupt bastards that we can in 2012, there also needs to be criminal prosecutions in some cases, too drive the point home. <br /><br /> “According to 28 USC 455, a Supreme Court justice must recuse from “any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” The law also says a justice must recuse anytime he has “expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy” while he “served in governmental employment.”<br /><br />Question: This would seem to preclude Elaina Kagan from hearing Barrycare at the Supreme Court?StanHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07395708786509590321noreply@blogger.com