tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post5864676039687843160..comments2023-09-15T04:27:57.129-04:00Comments on Commentarama: The MSM Finds A Villain--Then They Lie About ItAndrewPricehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-4796599949249401782010-08-28T19:18:05.472-04:002010-08-28T19:18:05.472-04:00Individualist: I know how you feel. I am reachin...Individualist: I know how you feel. I am reaching the point where I can't take another 30 seconds of self-righteous lectures and shaded truth from the liberals.LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-46456637695513701002010-08-28T18:41:58.581-04:002010-08-28T18:41:58.581-04:00Lawhawk
"All the hatred being stirred up by ...Lawhawk<br /><br />"All the hatred being stirred up by Islamophobic ignoramuses caused a crazed and drunken lefty to shout anti-Islamic words and stab a Muslim cab driver. Now do you understand?"<br /><br />Um .... No!<br /><br />But if it involves more lectures from liberals can I be left to my misgivings, please.<br /><br />"Luke, It is the truth, from a certain point of view......"<br /><br />I blame Star Wars - have to blame someone right! Funny how it has taken me 30 years to see that line for what it is....Individualisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11005025873042230314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-48724215893895481882010-08-28T14:33:00.078-04:002010-08-28T14:33:00.078-04:00Bev: I plead guilty to using Sharpton's words...Bev: I plead guilty to using Sharpton's words as an ongoing lie. It was indeed the Tawana Brawley case that prompted him to use that line the first time. He stirred up racial hatred and a deadly riot, thinking the lie he was fully aware of would never be revealed. The "coulda been" was the response to getting caught swimming in the pool of lies. He used it again when the jury returned a libel verdict against him for defaming one of the prosecutors.LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-23628110766198044362010-08-28T14:14:08.257-04:002010-08-28T14:14:08.257-04:00So Al Sharpton has been a very busy guy! Arizona l...So Al Sharpton has been a very busy guy! Arizona laws, DC Rally, GZ mosque. How does he do it?<br /><br />Hey and didn't Al use that same line about Tawana Brawley and that DA who raped her? It wasn't true, but it could have been? At least he's recycles!BevfromNYChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14953050916932306270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-53181127030739007012010-08-28T12:40:36.659-04:002010-08-28T12:40:36.659-04:00Andrew: You have bureaucratese down pat. "C...Andrew: You have bureaucratese down pat. "Considering" means exactly what you said it means.<br /><br />The bureaucrats deny that the mosque is at Ground Zero, after all it's two blocks away (actually a block and a half). But city assistance was supposed to go to any building that was directly damaged or destroyed by the attack. St. Nicholas Church is one of those structures. So how does that all work out? Let's help the people who say that America was complicit in the 9-11 attack and "created al Qaeda" to build a structure a whole "two blocks" from the attack, but deny the permits or land-trades for a church which was destroyed by the attack. We must keep religion separate from the state entirely, unless the religion is Islam.LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-31729338438062359962010-08-28T12:12:11.389-04:002010-08-28T12:12:11.389-04:00Lawhawk, "Considering" is just another w...Lawhawk, "Considering" is just another way of saying "of course I'm going to do it, but I'm going to wait until this issue leaves the front page."<br /><br />I heard about the Greek church, that's total BS. I hope they sue the heck out of the city and win.AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-20994662487634643362010-08-28T11:51:57.185-04:002010-08-28T11:51:57.185-04:00Andrew: I didn't get all the details, but I d...Andrew: I didn't get all the details, but I did hear that the New York City Controller was still "considering" a city loan to kick-start the construction, but has not made any decision yet. While proclaiming the necessity of the building of the mosque as proof of separation of church and state, they will at the same time consider lending money for the building of a religious monument. Only liberals can think like that.<br /><br />In the meantime, St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church cannot get permits to rebuild its church destroyed on 9-11 because the city has reneged on its promises and doesn't want to appear to be supporting a religious institution. Can you say "double-think?"LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-84357277936141183772010-08-28T11:46:28.801-04:002010-08-28T11:46:28.801-04:00Lawhawk, Yet another outrage by the MSM. It's...Lawhawk, Yet another outrage by the MSM. It's no wonder that their readership is down and that faith in reporters is heading toward zero percent. At some point, they're either going to need to change their ways or disappear. I suspect they'll end up disappearing because they just don't want to hear that their ways are wrong.<br /><br />In a related noted, I saw yesterday that this mosque may not qualify for taxpayer support through some sort of low interest loan program. Talk about doubling down on outrage!!AndrewPricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11312364467936820986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-13586025527259471892010-08-28T11:06:52.454-04:002010-08-28T11:06:52.454-04:00Tennessee: I missed that WAPO movie review. But ...Tennessee: I missed that WAPO movie review. But it does seem to be just par for the course. Like the old gag, "don't confuse me with the facts." The deconstructionist school built a whole philosophy around it, which the MSM has adopted. Truth is nothing but what you perceive it to be. There's "your truth" and there's "my truth." Neither is superior to the other, except that one side is good and the other not so good. With no hard truths, there are no liars. Thus, they can state "their truth" without regard for pesky facts and evidence. That produces a defense of the Valerie Plame film just as it produced a crazed liberal who stabbed a Muslim because of right-wing bigotry.LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-16986240817732500452010-08-28T10:57:04.337-04:002010-08-28T10:57:04.337-04:00Joel: These people live in the liberal dreamworld...Joel: These people live in the liberal dreamworld. They already know all the answers, so they use the oldest trick in the rhetorical armory. Reach your conclusion in accordance with your beliefs, then find facts, any facts, no matter how remote or unrelated, to support that belief. Still, the conclusion that the stabber committed his act because of the "Islamophobia" of <i>others</i> is a leap of logic that is utterly breathtaking.LawHawkRFDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17800255923675295515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-28512468626320157012010-08-28T10:05:12.911-04:002010-08-28T10:05:12.911-04:00"well maybe it wasn't true, but it could ..."well maybe it wasn't true, but it could have been." This reminds me of the woman from WAPO who was defending the movie about Valerie Plaim by stating something akin to "sometimes facts have to be set aside to reveal a larger truth." <br /><br />Yesterday, the AP wrote a story about the "controversial" Glen Beck rally and once again stated the stories about racial epithets and posters at tea party rallies as if they were fact. Thank goodness for journolist, right?<br /><br />I continue to wonder whether these people are really that clueless a group of hypocrites or whether they are just arrogant hardball political operatives. If it is the latter, do they see how transparent their motives are?Tennessee Jedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10604275115906776992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4425587034622601550.post-86638732607417672332010-08-28T09:41:04.947-04:002010-08-28T09:41:04.947-04:00LawHawk,
What really bugs me about the MSM is the...LawHawk,<br /><br />What really bugs me about the MSM is they wonder why their audience is dwindling. <br /><br />I can understand getting into an argument and being chased up a tree, metaphorically speaking, but isn't there an adult around them to correct them?<br /><br />I am beginning to think that all news divisions are just vanity organizations for the owners. They don't make any money unless you are talking about FOX news.Joel Farnhamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15856960977033430002noreply@blogger.com