Thursday, December 15, 2011

T-Rav's Sockpuppet Theater Presents: Children of the Corn 2!

Because the last one worked so well, they're doing it again tonight! Live from Iowa, it's Children of the Corn 2: Pandering Boogaloo! Join us, tonight on Fox at 9:00 PM EST, casual dress, overalls preferred, B.Y.O.B. Farm subsidies for the first twenty people through the door!


Come one, come all....
... will Newt insult us all?
... will Romney say something memorable?
... will Ron Paul praise our new Iranian overlords?
... will Rick Perry shake the Teletubby?
... will anyone finally realize Santorum offers us utopia?
... will Bachmann don black-face to attract Cain's supporters?
... will Huntsman finally become a 2%er?

All this and more, tonight! Leave your thoughts below.
at

534 comments:

  1. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 4:09 PM

    I'll post the feed once we have it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. CrispyRiceDecember 15, 2011 at 4:14 PM

    I've really lost track of the debates. Too many! Ack.

    Enjoy the evening, though!

    ReplyDelete
  3. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 4:27 PM

    Tonight's debate is brought to you by Total® Hypocrisy.* Because seven GOP presidential candidates still don't contain all the cereal hypocrisy in one bowl of Total®!

    * Now with Crunchy Denial Clusters™!

    ReplyDelete
  4. TOTUSDecember 15, 2011 at 4:32 PM

    Stop cutting in on my Obama O's.

    ReplyDelete
  5. POTUSDecember 15, 2011 at 4:32 PM

    Stop--uhh--cutting in.

    On my...Obama O's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. DUQDecember 15, 2011 at 4:33 PM

    Is that bologna sandwich Romney is turning into?

    ReplyDelete
  7. IndividualistDecember 15, 2011 at 4:37 PM

    IS it true that if Standard and Poor's downgrades our debt Souza'a Washington Inauguarial March for the POTUS will be replaced with NApaleon XIV's "There coming to take me away, Ha Ha!"

    Just asking

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tennessee JedDecember 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM

    as has always been the case, I'm not set up to see the debate and post, but know you guys will have a good time with it. Hope they actually can work on Barry tonight instead of each other. Alas, that is the nature of these things.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM

    DUQ, Yes indeed... bologna on white bread.

    Crispy, I've lost track too.

    TOTUS/POTUS, I'll pass.


    Indi, I've heard that's true. They've also got a lien on several monuments and apparently, they've ordered packing crates. :(

    tryanmax, Yum... Crunchy Denial Clusters!

    ReplyDelete
  10. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 4:56 PM

    Jed, Sadly, I suspect more of the same tonight. But who knows? I guess someone might surprise us?

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousDecember 15, 2011 at 5:08 PM

    T-Rav: I'll be AWOL again this evening. It's the Christmas get-together at the grandkids' school. But reading the comments from our readers is a lot more fun than watching the debates anyway. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  12. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 5:12 PM

    Here's a fascinating off-topic link. If you recall my article last week about the left becoming antiSemitic, here's official MSM verification, in which they note the Simon Weisenthal Center agrees:

    Time To Clean Up The Discourse

    Here's my original article on the topic: LINK

    ReplyDelete
  13. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 5:27 PM

    B.Y.O.B., for the record, in this case stands for "Bring Your Own Barn."

    Andrew, should I find it disturbing that you now only have normal pictures of Bachmann and Huntsman?

    ReplyDelete
  14. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 5:42 PM

    T-Rav, That should probably read "B.Y.O.C." with the "C" meaning "candidate."

    As for finding the images disturbing.... yeah, probably.

    ReplyDelete
  15. IndividualistDecember 15, 2011 at 6:52 PM

    T-Rav and Andrew

    What's abnormal about the picture og Gaius Newtus Gingritchinas?

    Looks spot on to me

    ReplyDelete
  16. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 6:53 PM

    Incidentally, my answers to the questions posed are yes, no, yes, no, family, win-win-win, and probably not. You figure it out.

    ReplyDelete
  17. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 6:54 PM

    Indi: Well played, sir. Well played.

    ReplyDelete
  18. IndividualistDecember 15, 2011 at 7:37 PM

    Off topic but Before I miss is it

    http://books.google.com/books?id=4ocVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA34&lpg=PA34&dq=individualists+corner+poetry&source=bl&ots=NkCpAZdQoC&sig=ttkWHMhY9a99wjugQowokE76KCM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=L5LqTpC8JMmXtwfo9ZHkCg&sqi=2&ved=0CFwQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false

    Page 34 of this link Good Screed

    ReplyDelete
  19. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 8:27 PM

    I was just watching "Miracle on 34th Street," and it occurred to me I'd much rather have this on the TV than stupid candidate people. Thanks, GOP losers. (sigh)

    ReplyDelete
  20. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 8:30 PM

    T-Rav, I'm missing a football game for this. Grrr.


    Indi, Here's your link: LINK

    ReplyDelete
  21. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 8:38 PM

    Well, I just read that Current TV (you know, the Al Gore network) is going to have a one-hour post-debate show. Obviously, Gore wants this to be a professional, impartial examination of the debate, so who is hosting it? Failed MSNBC hack Cenk Uygur and failed Democratic governor of Michigan Jennifer Granholm, of course. I'm going to go grab something to eat, and also die laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  22. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    since the semester is over I can actually give the debate a go... we'll see if it can hold my attention enough to keep me from surfing back to the Hallmark movie or CSI:NY reruns...

    ReplyDelete
  23. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 8:53 PM

    Yay rla! Screw those professors! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  24. BevfromNYCDecember 15, 2011 at 8:54 PM

    I'm still at work, so I am not sure whether I'll be able to stomac...er...join in tonight. I will try.

    ReplyDelete
  25. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    T-Rav - yours done?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Barack ObamaDecember 15, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    Personally, I think this is going to be a great debate, guys. But then, I thought the last debate was great too!

    ReplyDelete
  27. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 8:58 PM

    rla, I am indeed finished for the semester. I wrote two big papers, only one of which I understood, and then graded about 50 exams in one weekend, most of which had very stupid things to say. So it's been a standard end-of-semester experience.

    ReplyDelete
  28. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:00 PM

    Hey, I've been to Sioux City! Or maybe that was Sioux Falls, which is in South Dakota. They're kind of interchangeable, really.

    ReplyDelete
  29. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:01 PM

    No, don't cheer these people, you are only encouraging them.

    ReplyDelete
  30. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:01 PM

    Where's Santorum?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Jon HuntsmanDecember 15, 2011 at 9:01 PM

    That applause for me sounded so non-perfunctory! I'm pleasantly surprised!

    ReplyDelete
  32. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM

    Their sounds stinks again -- just like last time.

    ReplyDelete
  33. President ObamaDecember 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM

    I am the greatest threat to America.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bret BaierDecember 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM

    ...With all that said, Newt Gingrich, do you regret your divorces and affairs?

    ReplyDelete
  35. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM

    Most electable?

    d) None of the above.

    ReplyDelete
  36. NewtDecember 15, 2011 at 9:03 PM

    I AM GOD!

    ReplyDelete
  37. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:03 PM

    Why do I feel like Newt was pandering to social conservatives just then? And what does that say about me?

    ReplyDelete
  38. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM

    Newt: I can say Reagan. So i win...

    ReplyDelete
  39. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM

    Checking in! I had to pour me a bowl of Crunch Berries.

    ReplyDelete
  40. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM

    it says you're paying attention

    ReplyDelete
  41. DemocratsDecember 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM

    Newt is threatening to cut off the President's legs!!! THREATENING TONE!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  42. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM

    Also, I have lost one "shift" key, which is really throwing me.

    ReplyDelete
  43. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    bing!

    ReplyDelete
  44. LaughableDecember 15, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    I don't know you sir.

    ReplyDelete
  45. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    rla, but did you show him how to defeat Communism like Newt did? DID YOU???

    ReplyDelete
  46. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    nope - also didn't convince him to believe in Reaganomics

    ReplyDelete
  47. Ron Paul!December 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    Those are evil establishment Republican neocons! GOLD!!!

    ReplyDelete
  48. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    Puff question to Paul.

    ReplyDelete
  49. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    Nice comment by Paul!

    ReplyDelete
  50. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    Puff answer from Paul.

    ReplyDelete
  51. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM

    This is where Paul is good.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Mahmoud AhmedinejadDecember 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM

    I say, I rather like this Paul fellow's foreign policy.

    ReplyDelete
  53. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:07 PM

    Sir, is that corn in your pocket?!

    ReplyDelete
  54. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    sir, why are you irrelevant?

    ReplyDelete
  55. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    Yes, this is good. I just meant the "anyone can beat Obama" bit.

    ReplyDelete
  56. News FlashDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    Santorum is firebug!

    ReplyDelete
  57. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    Santorum: My plan was to suck all along.

    ReplyDelete
  58. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    I bet he also visited every county in Pennsylvania in 2006, which worked well for him.

    ReplyDelete
  59. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    cough cough.... bullship.... cough cough

    ReplyDelete
  60. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:08 PM

    he stands right there - see him??

    ReplyDelete
  61. BeakerDecember 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    Iowans are beginning to respond. I've gone from 0% to 0.1%

    ReplyDelete
  62. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    Andrew, I suspect the candidates will all yank off their suits sometime during the debate to reveal they are wearing overalls and straw hats.

    ReplyDelete
  63. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM

    Romeney: Let me just not answer that question for you.

    ReplyDelete
  64. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM

    lips moving...

    words hitting ears....

    brain no translate....

    ReplyDelete
  65. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM

    tryanmax - good sum up!

    ReplyDelete
  66. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM

    Wow, this is the most conservative message I've heard yet from Romney.

    ReplyDelete
  67. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:10 PM

    These totally look like game show podiums.

    ReplyDelete
  68. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:11 PM

    T-Rav, That would liven thing up!


    To borrow from Strictly Ballroom:


    "Show me your square dance..."

    ReplyDelete
  69. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:11 PM

    By which I mean, he included the line about the private sector creating jobs, not the government. That's about it. (Don't want people thinking I've gone off my meds--again...)

    ReplyDelete
  70. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:11 PM

    Correct answer should be "there's no such thing as too conservative."

    Let's see what she says...

    ReplyDelete
  71. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM

    Bachmann is an action person?

    Show me 1 bill she got passed.

    ReplyDelete
  72. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM

    Andrew, you jest, but if any of them can prove they know the words to "Cotton-Eye Joe," I will be compelled to vote for them.

    ReplyDelete
  73. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM

    She's been a "real person" ... unlike that male mannequin.

    ReplyDelete
  74. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM

    Lord, help us - keep your foot out of your mouth, Gov!

    ReplyDelete
  75. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:12 PM

    Obama is an accomplished debater like I am an accomplished brain surgeon.

    ReplyDelete
  76. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    Andrew, didn't you find that Bachmann action figure in your box of cereal hypocrisy?

    ReplyDelete
  77. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    No, no, Rick, talking a lot is what got you here in the first place. It's called "learning from your mistakes."

    ReplyDelete
  78. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    F-you on the Tebow mention jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  79. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    he just brought in Tebow!

    ReplyDelete
  80. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    Are we talking politics or football?

    ReplyDelete
  81. NeilDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    Governor Hunstman.... why are you here?

    ReplyDelete
  82. George W. BushDecember 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM

    Anyone else find that hard to understand?

    ReplyDelete
  83. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    so, he's only good in the 4th Q?

    ReplyDelete
  84. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    Huntsman is looking especially Bond-villain-esque tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  85. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  86. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    GWB - he didn't say anything, so it's OK.

    ReplyDelete
  87. HuntsmanDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    And I'm not going to be conservative.

    ReplyDelete
  88. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    Things just got trivial.

    ReplyDelete
  89. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    Can Mormons say screwed?

    ReplyDelete
  90. Jon HuntsmanDecember 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    I'm gonna prove I'm the true conservative. How? I'm gonna snub all the grassroots conservatives with their silly pledges and so on.

    ReplyDelete
  91. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    rlaWTX, Yep, he would only be good in his fourth year.

    ReplyDelete
  92. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    as long as they aren't drinking or smoking while they say it.

    ReplyDelete
  93. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    Huntsman is the 99%. Oops. Wrong crowd.

    ReplyDelete
  94. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:15 PM

    rla, interestingly, Perry tends to start well and then bomb. So maybe he's the anti-Tebow?

    ReplyDelete
  95. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    If a train leave Chicago at 2:00 pm....

    ReplyDelete
  96. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    good point, T-Rav

    ReplyDelete
  97. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    that wasn't the question, Perry!

    ReplyDelete
  98. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    Can't argue with that.

    ReplyDelete
  99. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    After 12 debates, you would think Perry would have learned to speak publicly.

    ReplyDelete
  100. TeletubbiesDecember 15, 2011 at 9:17 PM

    Perry's cute!

    ReplyDelete
  101. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:17 PM

    Romney kinda has a good answer

    ReplyDelete
  102. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:17 PM

    I missed the beginning. I assume the bleeps are the timer?

    ReplyDelete
  103. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:17 PM

    Am I stoned, or are we more than 15 minutes in and no personal slapdowns on stage so far? Is this how debates are supposed to go?

    ReplyDelete
  104. RomneyDecember 15, 2011 at 9:18 PM

    I LOVE to compromise. Vote me a Democratic Congress and I'm gold baby!

    ReplyDelete
  105. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:18 PM

    bleep - yep

    ReplyDelete
  106. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:18 PM

    The Constitution DOES work if you follow it Newt.

    ReplyDelete
  107. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    tryanmax, that's actually the countdown timer to the Mayan apocalypse. Prepare now!

    ReplyDelete
  108. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    Newt: Reagan. Reagan, Reagan. Reagan-Reagan-Reagan.


    Reagan!

    ReplyDelete
  109. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    Thanks, T-Rav! wondered...

    ReplyDelete
  110. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    Uh... no.

    ReplyDelete
  111. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:19 PM

    At once?

    ReplyDelete
  112. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    can she "order" Congress?

    ReplyDelete
  113. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    Does Bachmann have any original ideas?

    ReplyDelete
  114. Bleepy TimerDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    Why aren't you guys paying attention to me? I feel ignored.

    ReplyDelete
  115. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    Obama can order congress, so why can't she?

    ReplyDelete
  116. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    I'm voting for Huntsman! Woo hoo!!

    ReplyDelete
  117. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:20 PM

    bleep

    ReplyDelete
  118. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    Ouch, sorry, hit my head with a mallet before the last comment.

    ReplyDelete
  119. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    rla, there's this pesky "Constitution" thingamajig that won't let her. I thought she knew.

    ReplyDelete
  120. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    So far, the beeper is winning.

    ReplyDelete
  121. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    I can't do another site and Commentarama!

    ReplyDelete
  122. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM

    #answer or #dodge. I kinda like it.

    ReplyDelete
  123. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    And who will get the Daily Double?

    Bleep.

    ReplyDelete
  124. Diane SawyerDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    Whash with thish Baier dude? He'sh talking in short words and being too dishtinct. Where'sh my martini?

    ReplyDelete
  125. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    I figured since she was the expert she knew something I didn't... lol

    ReplyDelete
  126. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    I will say that Fox is being professional tonight and is getting answers. It's just that the answers are all kind of lame.

    ReplyDelete
  127. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    What was the last thing Paul said? I missed it.

    ReplyDelete
  128. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    so, can we nominate the Fox panel?

    ReplyDelete
  129. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:22 PM

    tryanmax, to answer your question above, no, nothing original.

    ReplyDelete
  130. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:23 PM

    rlaWTX, I nominate the beeper.

    ReplyDelete
  131. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:23 PM

    I would prefer the Fox panel.

    ReplyDelete
  132. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:23 PM

    My only wonder is why they didn't go with the "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" theme music. It'd be much more dramatic that way.

    ReplyDelete
  133. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:23 PM

    First win-win-win. Now, no new taxes. I could bust!

    ReplyDelete
  134. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    T-Rav, It does feel like a game show again, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  135. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    the Final Jeopardy music! People always stops when it stops!!!

    ReplyDelete
  136. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    The music for this Shriner's commercial kinda sounds like the Jeopardy theme, though.

    ReplyDelete
  137. M. BachmannDecember 15, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    Mr. tryanmax, I went to Obama and I said, tear down this wall sir.

    ReplyDelete
  138. T-Rav, Channeling Charlie SheenDecember 15, 2011 at 9:25 PM

    Yeah, Fox is winning tonight. And our candidates are still losing.

    ReplyDelete
  139. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:25 PM

    have some corn...

    ReplyDelete
  140. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:25 PM

    Stop it, Shelly. You're killing me.

    ReplyDelete
  141. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    text Iowa to vote for tonights new Iowa Idol!

    ReplyDelete
  142. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    Final debate??? oh just til Iowa...

    ReplyDelete
  143. IowansDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    You will respect us! We're smart! We can do stuff!

    ReplyDelete
  144. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    I've totally become one of those people who addresses people by unapproved nicknames.

    ReplyDelete
  145. M. BachmannDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    Mr. Obama looked at me and said we couldn't and I say, "yes we can, sir, yes we can."

    ReplyDelete
  146. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:26 PM

    Who cares what Democrats think? That's my question.

    ReplyDelete
  147. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:27 PM

    sock-puppets rule!

    ReplyDelete
  148. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:27 PM

    tryanmax, okay I'll bite. Who's Shelly?

    ReplyDelete
  149. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:27 PM

    Shelly, do you do birthdays?

    ReplyDelete
  150. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:28 PM

    Romney gets points from me tonight for being a businessman and for attacking Obama.

    Go big bologna!

    ReplyDelete
  151. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:28 PM

    Michelle Bachmann is Shelly.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Bawney FwankDecember 15, 2011 at 9:28 PM

    Hey, I wouldn't have a bad time in jail, if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  153. NewtDecember 15, 2011 at 9:29 PM

    I luv me some technicalities!

    ReplyDelete
  154. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:29 PM

    Isn't habitat for humanity Jimmy Carter's charity?

    ReplyDelete
  155. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:29 PM

    Huh? What?

    ReplyDelete
  156. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    I will say, the attacks on Newt over Freddie and Fannie are stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  157. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    Gingrich just said he loves government all over the private sector.

    ReplyDelete
  158. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    don't blame Habitat for Jimmy's insanity...

    ReplyDelete
  159. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    Especially when there is so much else to attack him for.

    ReplyDelete
  160. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM

    Paul is 100% right on this.

    ReplyDelete
  161. DemocratsDecember 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM

    Dear Ron Paul: Stop making intelligent points. It only misleads people.

    ReplyDelete
  162. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM

    More technicalities.


    PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT, PANDER ALERT

    ReplyDelete
  163. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM

    Wow! He brought up Austrian economics. I never expected that to come up in a debate. Too bad most people don't have a clue about them.

    ReplyDelete
  164. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    No Newt this is bullshit socialism. Go f-yourself you government loving turd.

    ReplyDelete
  165. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    I agree, the attacks on Newt over Fannie and Freddie are stupid, but then he had to go and say what he just said...

    ReplyDelete
  166. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    how are credit unions govt sponsored?

    ReplyDelete
  167. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    Go Bachmann!!!! She's finally right!

    ReplyDelete
  168. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    I love the split screen!

    ReplyDelete
  169. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    T-Rav, absolutely.

    His defense should be easy if he weren't a turd.

    ReplyDelete
  170. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    +10 for Bachmann.

    -1000 for Gingrich

    ReplyDelete
  171. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    So let me sum up Newt Gingrich's campaign arc: the early debate performances reminded us that Newt can be brilliant and a great debater at times. The more recent performances reminded us that he is Newt Gingrich.

    ReplyDelete
  172. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    can we move on from Freddie & Fannie?

    ReplyDelete
  173. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    You ARE LYING NEWT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  174. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM

    Maybe that's what the beepy button was. It was warning us that pandering lay ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  175. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM

    Wasn't there a political cartoon once of Newt as Jabba the Hutt? For some reason I have that image in my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  176. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM

    T-Rav, Newt is now showing us that he's in love with the worst parts of government.

    ReplyDelete
  177. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM

    memememememe

    ReplyDelete
  178. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:35 PM

    I now hate Newt.

    ReplyDelete
  179. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:35 PM

    Andrew, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  180. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:35 PM

    yep.

    ReplyDelete
  181. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM

    Be very careful in how you tread here, Newt, lest I turn green and emit smoke from my ears.

    ReplyDelete
  182. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM

    OH! sic'ing him with Paul Ryan!

    ReplyDelete
  183. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM

    I like the question, but could he have maybe shortened it?

    ReplyDelete
  184. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM

    Reagan Reagan Reagan.

    ReplyDelete
  185. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    Newt says "Reagan" more than Cain said "9-9-9".

    ReplyDelete
  186. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    Eh, I think Andrew's picture of him as a Roman emperor is much more flattering. At least I think it was a Roman emperor...

    ReplyDelete
  187. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    oh yeah, he's a politician...

    ReplyDelete
  188. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    Romney is solid tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  189. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:37 PM

    Oh, puh-leeez! The Ryan Plan phases in across, what is it?, 30 years. That's hardly cutting anything out from anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  190. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:38 PM

    T-Rav, I have the perfect picture. I'll update it for next time.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Captain Crunch and Count ChoculaDecember 15, 2011 at 9:38 PM

    Come on guys, be honest. You all would rather see us debate than these jokers, right?

    ReplyDelete
  192. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:38 PM

    Again with the reach-around, er, reach across the aisle.

    ReplyDelete
  193. T-RavDecember 15, 2011 at 9:39 PM

    No, it's actually a pretty straightforward question. Are you a hypocrite or not? (Hint: the answer is yes.)

    ReplyDelete
  194. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:39 PM

    I vote for the cereal debate.

    ReplyDelete
  195. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM

    HUH?

    ReplyDelete
  196. AndrewPriceDecember 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM

    I never voted for it, except I did.

    ReplyDelete
  197. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM

    Personally, I agree with what Paul says. However, that is not how Paul presents himself.

    ReplyDelete
  198. rlaWTXDecember 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM

    there was a point?

    ReplyDelete
  199. Ron PaulDecember 15, 2011 at 9:41 PM

    Me taking earmark money is perfectly fine, but don't worry, I'd get rid of it if I could.

    ReplyDelete
  200. tryanmaxDecember 15, 2011 at 9:41 PM

    Mmmm, Crunch Berries. (I gots 'em.)

    ReplyDelete