Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Look Into The Public Face Of Perversion

He doesn't look like "Chester the Molester" hanging out in the park waiting to attack your child sexually, does he? That's because the stereotypical pedophile is very careful not to look like that. It's the lovable uncle, or the guy who lives down the street and keeps his house looking great, or the teacher. In this case, the look seems to belong to the man chosen by the Obama administration to make sure your kids are safe at school. Yes, you read that right. He is Obama's Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings. You decide what he is.

Most of us have read something about this disgusting waste of oxygen on other sites, or saw something about him on Fox News Channel, or read in the leftist press that there was some sort of "controversy" about him. Like many of you, I said to myself: "Here we go again, another unqualified and bizarre Obama appointment." And I sort of dismissed it from my mind. He's a gay advocate, and has been involved in many gay organizations. Big deal. I have enough gay friends here in town to know I'd be safer leaving my kids with them than some heterosexuals I don't know as well.

On Saturday, something happened that made me look closer. GatewayPundit, a site I often visit and often agree with did a followup expose of this creep, with lengthy quotations and citations, including his reading list that he wants to impose on the toddlers to high schoolers in American public schools. And GateWay's reward was a massive cyber attack which slowed and eventually briefly shut the site down. I hadn't visited the site in some time, but for quick looks at what's going on in the blogosphere, I frequently peruse InstaPundit. They made me aware of the cyber attack, and also made me wonder what I didn't know (much like many of you) about Jennings.

If there's anyone in the Obama administration who represents pure evil, Jennings is it. He's not just a gay advocate. He's a promoter of kiddie porn, and more evilly, making little ones read this perverse garbage in school. He wants kids in kindergarten through early elementary school to be exposed to explicit sex material, particularly when it comes to children having sex with sick adults. I must have skimmed some of the early material produced on several major sites like Breitbart.com and the companion BigGovernment.com. But this time it was like being hit in the head with a hammer.

Jennings founded and was the former executive director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). Not my cup of tea, but innocuous-sounding enough not to raise too many of my hackles. Until now. The Network started small, but until our good Christian president picked him as Czar, became this lowlife's life work. His stated goal (then and now) was to "empower gay youth in the schools and to stop harassment by other students." It does the usual politically-correct diversions to worm its way into the public consciousness. It encourages "gay alliances" and condemns the use of hateful words. If I ever get within ten feet of him, he's going to find out what hateful words really are.

What caused the cyber attack on GatewayPundit was its nearly encyclopedic list of the books Jennings wants to employ to destroy all vestiges of normality and morality among our youth. And he believes in "get 'em young." Despite my utter disgust and anger, I'm going to be a little more cowardly than GatewayPundit, which listed not only the books, but multiple examples of their content. Instead, I'll provide you with a number of titles, and synopses of the content and leave it to you to look up the actual words on other sites. This is not because of any lack of will to do so, but rather from a sense of decency for our readers. Those who are not easily appalled can go beyond my summations and go directly to the sources. If you have a weak stomach, I'll just say "take my word for it, I read the damned things."

Queer 13: "A man masturbates and explicitly ejaculates as he sits on a hill overlooking his hometown." "A 13 year-old boy has a violent sexual encounter with an older man, which causes the boy to become desperate for sex, and he ends up spending the rest of the year promiscuously getting 'my cock sucked and my ass f---ed by a seemingly endless supply of dicks belonging to older men,' concluding with 'I really did enjoy those sexual encounters.'" "The author vividly describes masturbating and ejaculating whenever and wherever possible at the age of thirteen." "The author recalls with mixed emotions the sexual relationship he had with his cousin at the age of thirteen." "At the age of six, the author played 'sex therapist' with a five-year old friend, and explored our sexuality to the fullest.'" "A thirteen-year old boy carefully inspects his firend's genitals, admiring the size of his penis, then the author describes each of their masturbation techniques." "A boy avoids a schoolyard fight by agreeing to masturbate the other boys instead. He describes later how much more he likes the teachers' bodies than the students' bodies (with a few exceptions)."

Reflections of a Rock Lobster: "At the age of six, the author frequently performed fellatio on his fellow first-graders in the school restroom part of a busy 'homosexual childhood.'" "Two twelve-year old boys turn up the volume on a Christian song to drown out the noises of them having sex."

Mama's Boy, Preacher's Son: "A young boy clings to his mother whenever possible but enjoys sex with other boys and men as a way to get back at his father."

Growing Up Gay, Growing Up Lesbian: "A gay priest recalls a life-changing incident at the age of ten when he 'felt my penis begin to harden' after meeting a new friend, after which the author 'touched the flesh of his cock.'" "A man recounts how he had his first sexual experience at age twelve, and then recalls fondly the anal sex he had at fifteen with a much older man."

Being Different: No summaries.

Passages of Pride: "A fifteen year-old boy embarks on an intense sexual relationship with a much older adult man." "A woman recalls how as a teenager she had a sexual affair with an adult teacher at her high school which greatly boosted the girl's self-esteem." "At the age of five, a young child has sexual encounters with his playmates."

The Full Spectrum: "A five-year old and a six-year old girl play sex games."

Revolutionary Voices: "An illustration about the changes from 'boy to man,' showing two Boy Scouts pointing at and looking at two adult men engaging in anal sex." "A writer is unhappy that she was forced to stop masturbating in public when she turned nine years old." "An interview with a 'sex worker' who praises prostitution as a way to raise one's self-esteem and have empowering sexual experiences." "A poem in which the author fantasizes about cutting off his penis so he can become a woman." "A young author discusses 'this white-supremacist heteropatriarchy.'"

In Your Face: "The author describes how a sudden and impulsive sexual encounter was the healthiest relationship he's ever had then regrets the incestuous relationship he had with his cousin." "The author describes how at the age of sixteen he began having sex with a twenty-three year old man he met at a gay youth rally." "The author describes how when he was in fifth and sixth grades, he often had sex with his male classmates."

The Order of the Poison Oak: No summaries.

Love and Sex: Ten Stories of Truth: No summaries.

GLSEN maintains a recommended reading list of books, including all of the above titles, which they incomprehensibly say "further assures our mission to ensure safe schools for all students." The GLSEN officers have different opinions as to which books belong with which age group, but all agree that the sexual lessons should start as soon as the children are old enough to read. For those schools which accept the Czar Jennings recommended list as required reading as well as those teachers who would advise the kids to buy the books themselves, Jennings has provided an online ordering system, called GLSENBook Link.

The books listed and capsulized above were recommended for grades 7 to 12. I join GatewayPundit and all those other blogs in condemning this filth. This is light years beyond mere basic "sex education" which has always been a debating point between those who believe that sex should be handled by the parents and those who think the schools do a better job. This is nothing but hardcore pornography, leaning heavily toward early homosexual advocacy. I included the capsules just to make sure nobody thinks I'm some kind of prude, or that I may have overreacted to material that is not all that explicit.

I'm of the opinion that one way to make the schools safe is to keep the Safe Schools Czar and anybody connected with him as far away from children and schoolyards as possible. I am also astounded at my own naivete when first alerted to this monster's background and perverted advocacy. And I don't just worry about average heterosexual kids. Kids who are not yet sure of their sexuality, or have come to a youthful decision about it should be kept away from advocates like this as well. Jennings' book list is more about turning kids of any sexual orientation into raving sex machines as early as possible. All the better for creating the pickings for adult predators. He and Obama should both burn brightly in hell. Jennings, by the way, is a close friend of William Ayers. Figures.

Note: The day after the cyber attack, GatewayPundit reprinted an earlier article, complete with video. It's not for the faint-hearted, but it does demonstrate just what Jennings is trying to promote: "Fistgate".

24 comments:

HamiltonsGhost said...

Lawhawk--That's really bad stuff. After just reading the capsules, I decided to follow your advice and just take your word for the actual content. This guy needs to be the next guy under the Obama bus--yesterday!

Tam said...

And I thought the gay penguin story for preschoolers was bad. Disgusting. I am sure there is a nice warm spot beside the lake of fire and brimstone for this guy. At least I hope so.

LawHawkSF said...

HamiltonsGhost: I'm a fairly tough guy, and I've been around the block a few times. But this was way beyond the pale. I read about three of the actual excerpts, and gave up in disgust. I'm not easy to shock, but he managed.

LawHawkSF said...

Tam: I wrote a post about the gay penguins a few months back. I didn't think it was appropriate for the public schools, but I was able to keep my sense of humor about the whole thing. This is quantum leaps worse, and dangerous material. "And Tango Makes Three" sounds almost innocent after reading some of this poison.

Tam said...

I was annoyed about the penguin story, but like you, managed to maintain a sense of humor about it. I taught preschool for several years and witnessed some ridiculous discrimination against one of my colleagues (who happened to be gay, and also one of the most fantastic early childhood educators at the school). Awareness, compassion, and all the other touchy feely words and ideals certainly have their place, but this garbage has nothing to do with any of that.

patti said...

makes me want to punch someone. hard. 22 years ago i made the decision to homeschool my son because i disagreed with all of the public schooling and most of the private in my area. best choice we ever made. (to those who may worry: he's a functioning, reasoning, married, college graduate paying his own way thru life. whoop!) while this kind of vileness was never an issue, i can only imagine what other indoctrination these children are subjected to.

on a side note: a few years back i heard this conversation and dismissed it, "the gay community is becoming militant about marriage when a civil union would serve. they want to take something sacred to us and use it for their political purposes. if they get what they want regarding this issue, then it will embolden others to claim their stake. will we let pedophiles have their protections because it's their way to love?!"

whoa...

AndrewPrice said...

Wow, this is disgusting. And not surprisingly, this goes way beyond what is being told in the MSM. This guy needs to go.

And if gays want middle America to take them seriously, they need to start repudiating anyone who wants to mix children and sex. Silence equals consent.

DCAlleyKat said...

Every time I start to write something after reading this, I am overcome by severe retching. (not joking)

AndrewPrice said...

DCAlleycat, It's stunning isn't it that someone in authority could think this way?

ArmChairGeneral said...

Yes he is evil for teaching sin to children.

In Romans 1:26-27 Paul is very specific, “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.” In 1 Corinthians 6:9, Paul wrote, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind.”

ArmChairGeneral said...

Religion aside teaching sex and what sex is should belong solely to the parent not to some fantastical aquatic ceremony written by a sadistic child molester.

StanH said...

This is grotesque beyond belief. This nasty creep should not be within a 1000 yards of a school. Barry is playing with fire, don’t mess with the kids. I wonder will his two kids get this kind of a lesson? You read something like this, and can understand witch burning. Absolutely disgusting!

LawHawkSF said...

Tam: I assume you know that I live in San Francisco. Anyone who is anti-gay in this town is going to live a very lonely life. My lifelong best friend (who died last year) was gay, and I would have trusted him alone with my kids without hesitation. I really went out of my way in the article to point out that this is gay advocacy, in the schools, at outrageously low ages. But equally important, it's sexual advocacy, for small children, heterosexual or homosexual, or whatever might come in between. Sorry to hear your friend was treated so badly, and that's an issue that is slowly working itself out.

LawHawkSF said...

Patti: I know exactly what you mean. About the time I got to the third article, I was ready to do something really bad, but could only sputter and write the article instead.

Over ten years ago I was off on one of my rants about the difference between mutual tolerance and forced acceptance. I made the mistake of using the expression "gay agenda," and you'd have thought I said "baby murderer." Well, I was right, but naive. That agenda went far deeper than I had imagined.

LawHawkSF said...

Andrew: It's amazing how willfully blind the MSM choose to be. And they're complicit in these godawful appointments. They released just enough about this jerk's controversial past for people like you and me to think it was something a lot less perverted than it is in reality.

LawHawkSF said...

DCAlleyKat: Imagine the flip-flops my stomach was doing while I was reading the actual kiddie porn this guy wants kids to read. People of German blood are supposed to have cast-iron stomachs, but this acid burned right through mine.

LawHawkSF said...

ArmChair: I guess the only thing I would add to that is that we cannot sit quietly and let this go on its own. We need to take action "So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth." Rev 3:16. I don't want to face my Maker on Judgment Day and have to account for why I did nothing about this. Democrats are always blabbing about doing things "for the children." Is this what they had in mind?

LawHawkSF said...

StanH: I've been around in the real world for a lot of years, and I haven't exactly been a hothouse orchid. But I have to tell you that this caught me completely flat-footed. On my worst day, I never believed that this kind of filth could ever be institutionalized in the public schools with the complete support of the White House. It's beyond belief.

LawHawkSF said...

TO ALL OUR FAITHFUL READERS: I apologize to all of you for being so dilatory in getting back to your valuable comments. My 8:00 AM Pacific Time "two hour" early morning meeting ended up taking six hours, and this is the first opportunity I've had to get back to you. Believe me, I wasn't ignoring you.

CalFederalist said...

California in general and your fair city in particular have been using this garbage in their classes for years. But I guess the cancer wasn't spreading fast enough to the other states, so Obama decided to speed up the metastization by installing a filthmeister in DC. You know how you protect these delicate flowers in the schools? You have teachers, administrators and whoever else you can recruit to stop it. You don't make them more vulnerable and more subject to attack by giving them material that will cause ten-year olds to make sexual moves on their fellow students, male or female.

LawHawkSF said...

CalFed: I agree completely on the near-total failure of the schools to protect their most vulnerable while at the same time encouraging behavior which will make them even more vulnerable. An effeminate boy who is bullied because of it is an avoidable tragedy. An effeminate boy who has read the vile sexual guidebooks, complete with "how to do it" instructions who is then beaten up for acting on the reading is a crime. And the bullies aren't the only criminals, now are they?

LawHawkSF said...

ADDENDUM TO POST: Several of my friends (who e-mail me all the time, but are too timid to post comments on our blog) asked me if this child sex-obsessed nutcase wasn't recently the subject of a scandal when he was working at a school.

He was, indeed. He was a counseler at the school. A young teenage boy came in for help in dealing with his sexual exploitation and subsequent affair with a much older man.

Did he suggest the boy contact the police? Nope. Did he take it on himself to report the matter to Child Protective Services. Nope! He asked if the predator had been using a condom. Satisfied that he was, this useless piece of crap told the kid not to worry about it. I can think of at least one school that isn't safe.

FB Hink said...

Sorry I’m late to the discussion… This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children from bullying. Schools, in general, ignore bullying, regardless of the cause, until it results in violence and then victim and attacker are both arrested and sent to reform school.

This has everything to do with promoting an unhealthy and reprehensible life style based in sexual deviancy. It proves there are certain levels of hell on earth. I hope this guy and his fellow promoters burn in the hell on earth and the after life.

LawHawkSF said...

FBHink: You couldn't have been more correct on the politics of this disaster. It has nothing to do with protecting kids from bullies, and everything to do with sexualizing the very young. Hell holds a special place for them.

Post a Comment